BOARD MEETING: March
18, 2008
ATTENDANCE: Board:
Administrative Staff: Superintendent
Student Representative: Kyle Thompson,
1.
CALL TO ORDER: President Treece called the meeting
to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Board Room at the
PUBLIC COMMENT: None
CLOSED SESSION: The Board adjourned to Closed
Session at 6:01 p.m. in Room 6 at the
Readmission
Strange moved, Mayo seconded,
and the Board voted 5-0-0 to approve staff’s recommendation to deny readmission
to 1 student who did not meet conditions.
Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release/Complaint
Strange moved,
Eberhart seconded, and the Board voted 5-0-0 to rescind the non-reelection and
accept the resignation of certificated employee #24572.
2.
RECONVENE OPEN SESSION: The Board returned to Open Session
in the in the Board Room at the MDUSD Dent Center at 7:30 p.m. President Treece
asked Kyle Thompson, student representative from College Park High School to lead
the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
Expulsions
Student 38-08: Allen
moved, Mayo seconded, and the Board voted 5-0-0 that Student 38-08 be expelled
from all schools programs of the
Student 39-08: Eberhart moved, Mayo seconded, and the Board
voted 5-0-0 that Student 39-08 be expelled from all schools programs of the
Treece announced the items discussed and action taken in
Closed Session.
3.
CONSENT AGENDA
Eberhart moved, Strange seconded, and the Board voted 5-0-0
to adopt the Consent Agenda, thereby approving the following items:
3.1 Minutes
of the meetings of February 19 and February 25, 2008.
3.2 Certificated
Personnel
3.2.1 Leaves of Absence, Resignations, Retirements,
Employment
3.2.2 Resolution 07/08-70 Approval of Provisional Internship
Permit (PIP) Request
Adopted Resolution 07/08-70, authorizing Jessica Seghers to
apply for a Provisional Internship Permit (PIP) in order to complete his
assignment for the 2007-08 school year.
3.3 Classified
Personnel
3.3.1 Leaves of Absence, Resignations, Retirements,
Employment
3.4 Monthly Budget
Transfers and/or Budget Increases/Decreases for the Month of February 2008
3.5 Fiscal
Transactions for February 2008
3.6 Grant
Application Requests
3.6.1 California Department of Education 2008-09 Workforce
Investment Act, Title II; Adult Education and Family Literacy Act, Section 231
and EL Civics
Granted Mt. Diablo Adult Education permission to apply for a
one-year grant under Workforce Investment Act, Title II, Section 231 and EL
Civics Education. There is no impact to the General Fund. This grant would
bring approximately $400,000 to $600,000 in revenue to Mt. Diablo Adult Education’s
ESL, Adult Basic Education, Adult Secondary Education, GED and Adults with
Disabilities programs to carry out grant specifications.
3.6.2 State of
Approved submittal of an application to the State Board of
Education to provide supplemental educational services for schools in Program
Improvement. There is no cost to the General Fund. Reimbursement for services
is based on the number of students served. The allocation per student is
approximately $900 per year through Title I funds.
3.6.3 Kaiser Permanente Community Grant
Approved submittal of an application to the Kaiser
Permanente Community Grant Program for funding to establish a farm-to-school
program at
3.7 Award of Design
Services Contract to Wilsey Ham Engineering, Planning and Surveying
Awarded contract not to exceed $44,983 to Wilsey Ham
Engineering, Planning and Surveying for comprehensive engineering and design
services necessary for asphalt paving improvements at Monte Gardens Elementary,
Dent Center, and Shadelands Center. Funding Source: $24,490 – Measure C Funds; $20,493 – Facility
Acquisition and Construction Budget
3.8 Surveillance
System for
Approved an agreement with Deco Tech Services to provide and
install a video surveillance system at
4.
RECOGNITIONS
The Board recognized
5.
BOARD FORUM
This item is here for the Board of Education to discuss any
issues of concern.
5.1 Committee
Minutes
Treece reported that the Board received the minutes of the March 6 Measure
C Oversight Committee meeting and thanked John Ferrante for agreeing to
continue serving as committee chair.
5.2 Board Reports
(time limit – 3 minutes)
Eberhart said he and his daughter, working on math homework,
discovered a helpful website. He suggested that there be links on the District
website to websites useful to parents and students.
Mayo reported on attending a press conference at
Strange reported on attending the first in a series of community
meetings to be held throughout the District. This one was held at Concord High
on March 13. He said attendance was good, but not so large that participants
had to be split up into small discussion groups. He called the group discussion
good as well. He also attended the press conference at Glenbrook and a planning
meeting for the
Allen said he was “impressed with Strandwood,” which he
visited during the
Treece said she has a supply of “Classrooms Come First”
postcards that were passed out at the press conference on Monday should anyone
want to send them to the Governor. She announced that the Board received a letter
from former
5.3 Issues of
Concern
6.
PUBLIC COMMENT
David Barnes, president of the Black
Families Association, thanked the District for its support of the organization,
which provides scholarships to graduating seniors. On behalf of the
Association, he expressed support for the
7.
COMMUNICATIONS
7.1 Student
Representatives
Kyle Thompson reported on events, activities, and issues at
7.2 Organizations
Mike Noce, MDEA president, thanked everyone who attended the
news conference at
8.
REPORTS/INFORMATION: District/Site
Liaison Teams (DSLT)
McHenry said that for some time District staff have been
working on a strategy to support the Program Improvement, High Priority, and
high poverty schools through the use of District/Site Liaison Teams (DSLTs). Vivian
Boyd, director of curriculum and instruction, introduced members in the
audience who participate on a DSLT and also Priscilla Hopkins and Barbara Graniger from the Alameda County
Office of Education, who help structure the DSLTs at Program Improvement
schools. She presented an overview of the strategy. Highlights:
Schools: Bel Air, Cambridge, Fair Oaks, Meadow Homes, Rio Vista, Shore Acres,
and Ygnacio Valley elementary; Glenbrook, Oak Grove, and Riverview Middle; Mt.
Diablo and Ygnacio Valley high
Function of the DSLT: Meet at least four times during the school year to:
•
Ensure
that identified instructional strategies are fully implemented
•
Monitor
student academic progress, school-wide and for sub-groups
•
Develop
and use a cycle that regularly monitors teaching and learning
•
Identify
areas for improvement
•
Recommend
and refine educational strategies to improve student learning
•
Provide
and coordinate additional resources and professional development as needed
•
Assist
the school to review the Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) as a
“fluid” document that continues to meet the changing needs of its students
District assistance provided to each site
•
Completing
application process for the High Priority School Grant
•
Developing
the Academic Program Survey (APS) and analyzing results
•
Writing
the High Priority School Grant application
•
Rewriting
the site’s Single Plan for Student Achievement, keeping the Implementation
Survey/Academic Program Survey (APS) and identified corrective actions in mind
•
Corrective
actions match each school’s needs; it is not a one-size-fits-all solution (CDE)
•
Engage
in a systematic process of inquiry in direct response to school’s identified
needs
•
Support
site with budget development and prioritizing expenses
Preparation for District members
•
Extended
Ed Services Meetings
•
Role
of the District/Site Liaison Team (DSLT)
•
Single
Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Review
•
Assessing
Progress through Data Driven Dialogue
•
Learning
Focused Conversations: Strategies for one-on-one or small group
•
Facilitating
Change: Structures for small or large group
Preparation for Site members
•
SMART
Goals:
•
Specific
= (A) What percent of students, (B)
Which students (EL, Basic, Far Below)
•
Measurable
= How will learning be demonstrated and measured
•
Academic
= English Language Arts/Math
•
Relative
to Long Term Goal = End of the Year
•
Time
Bound = By when
•
Grade
Level Discussion Guide for Previewing Interim Assessments: Evaluating strength
of the assessment
•
Grade
Level Meeting: Discussion Guide Assessment Analysis: Evaluating individual
student progress and proper placement in program
Observation Protocol: Each site has developed its own
•
Academic
Language
•
Structured
response
•
Sentence
frames
•
Active
Student Engagement
•
More
student talk - less teacher talk
•
Partner/small
group work
•
Teacher
monitoring
Parent/Family Connections
•
Building
on Leadership Institute:
•
Family
Friendly Schools
•
Cultural
proficiency; ELAC
•
Home
visits: Nell Soto Grant
Board comment Eberhart asked for data
to show which parts of program are working, which need to be improved. Boyd
said some anecdotal evidence has been collected, but staff are still looking at
data. Eberhart said a look at programs would provide more information and be a
better indicator of improvement than API scores. He asked how pacing guides work
with children who are not at grade level. Boyd said the purpose of the guides
is to provide common assessments, but the teacher has flexibility in using
them. She explained that an examination of API results at the site level
identify the different student needs so teachers can make plans to meet those
needs, not just of students who are not at grade level but of those who are
exemplary and are ready to go beyond the grade level. Mayo said principals have
told her that they try to balance classes so there is an equitable distribution
of ability levels in each classroom. Boyd said grade level meetings allow
teachers to discuss student needs and provide groupings during “universal
access time” to meet those needs. Mayo said she values the pacing guides
because they assure that every student is receiving access to the curriculum on
an ongoing basis even if they have different learning styles and progress at
different rates. Treece said the P-16 Council, a county group of education and
business representatives, discussed student access to the curriculum at a
recent meeting .She was excited to observe strategies such as Read 180 in use
at Riverview and Glenbrook middle schools. In response to Treece, Boyd said the
EduSoft software is invaluable in assessing student data to provide the basis
for teacher conversations about their students. Boyd said the next step for
schools that have DSLTs is to have articulation meetings to share experiences.
9.
SUPERINTENDENT'S REPORT
McHenry thanked all the people in the district who continue
to do the work to serve students every day. To date, he said, 145 positions
have been reduced, meaning that more than 100 people may lose their jobs. “Yes,
morale is a factor right now,” he said, but pointed out that if you visit
schools sites and talk with teachers and other support personnel, you will find
people continuing “to make sure we carry out our primary mission, which is to
serve the students of this district.” He
stressed that no one takes any joy in reducing the budget and yet “we may have
to go even further” because there is still a revenue-expenditure gap. He urged
the public to put pressure on the Governor and state legislators to get some budget
relief and promised to “work toward that effort myself.”
10.
BUSINESS
10.1 Appointment of Director of Curriculum and
Instruction
Strange moved, Mayo seconded, and the Board voted 5-0-0 to
appoint
10.2 2007-08 Second Interim Report
•
General
Fund: Revenue Assumptions, Key Factors
•
Declining
Enrollment
•
Average
Daily Attendance (
•
Cost
of Living Adjustments
•
Possible
Deficit Factors in 2008-2009 & 2009-2010
•
Federal,
State and Local Revenues
•
Contributions
from Unrestricted to Restricted
Programs through February 25, 2008
Special Education $29,174,610
Transportation 2,923,230
Routine Repair & Maintenance Account 8,442,665
(Legally
required for Prop 55 and Deferred Maintenance)
Other Programs Contributions 1,083,401
Total
Contributions $41,623,906
•
Designations
of the Projected Unrestricted Ending Fund Balance - June 30, 2008
COMPONENTS OF THE $19,319,002 FUND BALANCE
Revolving Cash/Stores $1,047,109
Economic Uncertainties 5,876,226
FCMAT Recommendations 78,965
Credential Compliance Penalty 0
Lottery Allocation 105,522
Phase I Energy Mgmnt. Conservation 2,500,000
Spieler Consent Decree 500,000
Student Information System 516,264
Site/Department Carryover 200,000
Undesignated Reserves 8,494,916
•
MULTI
YEAR Projections (through February 25, 2008)
Unrestricted Projected Ending Fund Balance
|
Description |
2007-2008 |
2008-2009 |
2009-2010 |
|
Beginning
Balance |
$ 17,660,742 |
$ 19,319,002 |
$ 10,133,425 |
|
Revenues
and other Financing Sources |
172,502,315 |
161,397,682 |
166,137,745 |
|
Expenditures
and other Financing Uses |
170,844,055 |
170,583,258 |
172,157,745 |
|
Net
Increase/Decrease in Fund Balance |
1,658,260 |
(9,185,577) |
(6,020,000) |
|
Ending
Fund Balance |
19,319,002 |
10,133,425 |
4,113,425 |
|
Undesignated Ending Fund Balance |
$ 8,494,916 |
$ 2,691,116 |
$ (3,530,112) |
•
Budget
Status at Second Interim
•
Through
Feb. 25, 2008: District unable to meet requirement of 2% reserve in 2009-10
•
Reductions
through March 11, 2008, improve ending balance, but
•
Uncertainty
about additional reductions in State funding
•
Uncertainty
about whether all reductions can be achieved
•
Desire
to increase employee compensation
•
Many
current reductions are one-time, District is deficit spending
•
Status
reviewed again at Third Interim
Fiscal Impact: The
General Fund Unrestricted Unappropriated Fund Balance is projected to be
$8,292,916 as of June 30, 2008. The General Fund has $5,876,226 as the required
2% Economic Uncertainties Reserve. At this time the District will, however, be
unable to meet this reserve requirement in the 2009-10 fiscal year. Because of
this condition, the District must file a “qualified certification” for the
2007-08 school year.
Board comment In response to
Strange, Nicoll said a $2 million shortfall in the current year budget has been
identified, due primarily to Special Education, Research and Evaluation, and
security needs. Strange asked and Nicoll responded to a number of questions
about changes in the budget from the First Interim to the Second Interim
reports. In response to Mayo, Nicoll said Measure C is winding down, so there
will be smaller ending balances in accounts related to that program. Mayo noted
that attendance is up, benefitting the District and showing that sites are
working to improve things. Eberhart noted changes in the Adopted Budget, the
First Interim Report, and the Second Interim Report. He said the current report
showed “good solid work,” but he has questions about previous reports during
the past year. He asked for a Board study session on the budget. Treece said
she appreciates the complexity of the budget and all the work being done by
Nicoll and Fiscal Services staff and hopes the District will get to a ‘’positive”
certification by the Third Interim.
Board action
Mayo moved, Allen seconded, and the Board voted 5-0-0 to approve
the 2007-08 Second Interim Report as presented, with a “qualified”
certification.
10.3 Review and Discussion of Priority for Add
Backs
McHenry said he put this item on the agenda for Board
discussion because parents and staff asked, during budget reductions, what
criteria the Board would use to restore programs and positions that were reduced
or eliminated if additional money becomes available. He noted that as of March
11, the Board has approved more than $14.9 million in budget reductions and
fund shifts to meet an expected $14 million shortfall in the 2008-09 school
year. Of that total, $8.6 million is on-going and $6.3 million is one-time
money gained from fund shifts and recapture of money reserved for other
purposes. He said additional budget reductions will be necessary. The amount is
not yet known. More information will be available in May at the time of the Governor’s
“May Revise” to the budget he proposed in January. Despite the possibility for
more budget reductions, parents and employees would like the Board to establish
priorities for add backs, he said.
Board comment
Eberhart moved and Strange seconded a motion that the District settle the
employee contracts before considering any addbacks. Mayo expressed concern that
the Board may not have completed all the reductions that will be necessary and may
have to cut more to afford employee compensation. She noted that the District
has to comply with any mandates and that other Board members have expressed
concern about campus safety. For these reasons, she is not ready to support the
motion until the Board has a discussion on the other issues. Eberhart said he would
have to agree if the Governor’s proposal is not modified. He clarified his motion,
saying that as the Board looks at ways to spend additional dollars should, for
example, the Governor’s proposal be cut in half, he wants to consider the
employee contracts first and then the addbacks. Strange said the goal should be
to have funds available to finance the offers on the table before considering
addbacks. Allen remarked that he’s always said employee compensation is a
priority, so he agrees with funding the offers on the table. Mayo said she’s seeing
reports projecting cuts in federal spending for Special Education and Career
Technical Education. “If we don’t prepare, we may have to eliminate more
positions,” she said, adding, “I do support employee compensation, but we must be
mindful of possible demands on funding.” Strange and Treece both stressed that mandates
would, of course, have to be met before any other expenditure, so the motion to
make employee compensation a priority would not be affected.
Board action
Eberhart moved, Strange seconded, and the Board voted 4-1-0 (Mayo, no; Student
Rep, yes) that, as its top priority, the District ensure that funds are set
aside to afford the District offers already on the table to settle employee
contracts first before considering any addbacks.
10.4 Appointment of Summer School
Administrators
Mayo moved, Eberhart seconded, and the Board voted 5-0-0 to
appoint Robert Humphrey, to
10.5 Board Policy 6146.1 – High School
Graduation Requirements
The Board considered a draft of a clarification
to BP 6146.1, “High School Graduation Requirements” with regard to Physical
Education and the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE).
Public comment
Jim Keck, P.E. teacher and wrestling coach, pointed out that 10th
graders can ask for a deferment from 10th grade P.E. if they have passed
their 9th grade P.E. class and met 4 of 5 physical fitness
standards. Mike Ahn, P.E. teacher and coach, took issue with the inclusion of
interscholastic athletics as one of the deferment criteria. Mike Noce, physical
educator, reiterated his concerns he’s expressed in two previous Board meetings
about allowing students to be deferred from 10th grade P.E.
Board comment
Board members had a lengthy discussion of this topic. Among the
comments: Strange suggested changes to the text, including clarification of the
definition of “exemption.” Allen noted that current policy requires students to
pass the physical fitness standards in 9th grade in order to request
an exemption and must complete two years of P.E. to meet graduation
requirements. Eberhart expressed concern that the policy does not address a
student’s ability to take P.E. for credit in summer school, which he does not support.
Mayo said that “what we desperately need is an additional period” for students
to take all the courses they need and want, but funding is a factor.” Treece
pointed out that students who request a deferment in order to participate in
interscholastic athletics are typically engaged in a physical fitness activity.
Presented as information at the
February 25 meeting, this item was returned for action at this time. McHenry
advised postponing action until the Curriculum staff have met with the physical
education teachers. The Board consensus was to postpone action.
10.6 Board Policy and Administrative Rule 5121
Grades/Evaluation of Student Achievement
The Board considered a draft of a clarification to BP/AR
5121 in regard to the definition of grades. The proposal adds Pass (P) added to
grade marking. Presented as information only at this meeting, this item will be
returned for action at a subsequent meeting.
Board comment Eberhart said he
believes students in some classes are graded on a curve even though the policy
does not permit it. He also disagrees with separating a student’s behavior,
effort, and attendance from the academic grade/rubric scores. He also believes
that all students must earn a 2.0 grade point average in order to participate
in extra activities, without the exception allowed for in the policy. Mayo
expressed concern for Special Education students and said she would talk to
staff about it. McHenry said the California Interscholastic Federation requires
student athletes to maintain a 2.0 GPA. Treece said she does support the
distinction between a student’s behavior and academic achievement. Allen asked
the superintendent to find out why the distinction is made.
11.
ADJOURNMENT
Eberhart said he received two text messages during the
meeting informing him that the radio broadcast unexpectedly ended well before
its usual 10 p.m. signoff time. He asked staff to find out if CVHS radio can
broadcast Board meetings in their entirety. Treece adjourned the meeting at 10:29
p.m.